Thursday, November 23, 2017

#2,468. Kull the Conqueror (1997)


Directed By: John Nicoletta

Starring: Kevin Sorbo, Tia Carrere, Thomas Ian Griffith



Tag line: "Courage Conquerors All"

Trivia: While practicing for the fight scenes, Kevin Sorbo nicked himself with a dull-bladed prop sword. At his request, producers gave him a rubber sword








I’m a proud fan of ‘80s fantasy / adventures (Conan the Barbarian, Dragonslayer, Clash of the Titans, Time Bandits), even the silly ones (like Krull and The Sword and the Sorcerer), and I always have a great time whenever I watch these films. 

Kull the Conqueror, however, is a ‘90s fantasy adventure, and I didn’t find it nearly as entertaining as its ‘80s counterparts. 

Having just defeated Borna (Sven-Ole Thorsen), the near-crazed King of Acheron, in a battle to the death, the barbarian Kull (Kevin Sorbo) inherits the King’s crown, and becomes the new ruler of the land. Naturally, this doesn’t sit well with the rightful heirs, including the warrior prince Taligero (Thomas Ian Griffith), who plots openly to dispose of Kull as soon as possible. To this end, Taligero and the others conspire with Enaros (Edward Tudor Pool), a wizard whose mastery of ancient magic allows him to raise the 2,000-year-old demon witch Akivasha (Tia Carrere) from the dead, in the hopes she can help them destroy Kull once and for all. 

Though he has developed feelings for Zareta (Karina Lombard), a palace slave who can see into the future, Kull quickly falls under Akivasha’s spell, and after a hastily-arranged wedding ceremony he declares her his queen. 

Does the mighty Kull possess the strength to eventually resist the evil Akivasha, or will she use her vast powers to transform Acheron into a hell on earth?

One of the many issues I had with Kull the Conqueror was its hard rock soundtrack, which, though not prevalent throughout the entire movie, doesn’t quite fit the scenes in which it is employed (like the opening sequence, when Kull is trying to prove he’s worthy of joining Taligaro’s honor guard). With its lackluster costumes, bland set pieces, and shoddy special FX, Kull the Conqueror also has a made-for-TV feel about it, a la Hercules: The Legendary Journeys (starring Kevin Sorbo) or Xena: Princess Warrior, both of which were popular shows at the time this film was produced. In addition, the world created for Kull the Conqueror isn’t all that impressive. Nor, for that matter, is it’s mythology; Enaros conjures up Akivasha far too easily, and she, in turn, wins Kull’s affections moments after the two first meet. As a result, the movie’s more fantastical scenes have no real weight to them. 


The cast does a decent job; while he doesn’t have the screen presence of Schwarzenegger or Stallone, Kevin Sorbo fits the part of Kull well enough, and isn’t the worst lead actor I’ve ever seen. As for the chief baddie, Tia Carrere delivers a spirited performance as Akivasha, the demon who becomes a Queen. Unfortunately, none of the film’s characters (including these two) are as defined as they could have been, giving us zero reason to care about a single one of them. 

In all fairness, the ‘90s did produce a few effective fantasy / adventures (I enjoyed 1995’s Jumanji), but thanks to its myriad of problems, Kull the Conqueror was not one of them







1 comment:

Peter Nielsen said...

Hey, Dave

Kull the Conqueror is actually not a bad movie... at least not ALL bad! It's certainly not in the same league as the fantastic 80's fantasy/sword & sorcery movies, but still... What irked me the most was, as you yourself state, the music! The heavy metal soundtrack seems a little out of place...
The acting is ok, and I like Kevin Sorbo as Kull! As for the movie itself, you're spot on when you say that it has a made-for-TV-movie feel about it, because it does! Which doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing, if done right, that is...
I'm a huge fan of The Beastmaster, The Sword and the Sorcerer, Dragonslayer, the Conan movies, and other movies of that ilk from the 80's, but they all had something that Kull the Conqueror lacks... and to be fair, I'm not 100% sure what that is... maybe it's a kind of innocence that movies in the 80's had... maybe it's sheer entertainment value... because I, for one, have more fun watching this type of movie if it's made in the 80's, as opposed to newer ones... Does that make sense?

As always... great review, my friend!
Talk soon!

Peter